Here is a resource page that has been compiled for some common Web 2.0 tools, check it out at Resource Page.pdf
Data done right
By dr.scott.mcleod@gmail.com (Scott McLeod)
on technologyleadership
When eduwonkette
asked me to guest blog about data-driven decision-making in schools, I
eagerly agreed. Why? Because in my work with numerous school
organizations in multiple states, I have seen the power of data
firsthand. When done right, data-driven education can have powerful
impacts on the learning outcomes of students.
Unfortunately, most
school districts still are struggling with their data-driven practice.
Much of this is because they continue to think about using data from a
compliance mindset rather than using data for meaningful school
improvement. An uninformed model of data-driven decision-making looks
something like this:
This is the NCLB model. Schools are expected to collect data once a
year, slice and dice them in various ways, set some goals based on the
analyses, do some things differently, and then wait another whole year
to see if their efforts were successful. Somehow, this model is
supposed to get schools to 100% proficiency on key learning outcomes.
This is dumb. It’s like trying to lose weight but only weighing
yourself once a year to see if you’re making progress. Compounding the
problem is the fact that student learning data often are collected near
the end of the year and given back to educators months later, which of
course is helpful to no one.
A better model looks something like this:
The key difference in this model is an emphasis on ongoing progress
monitoring and continuous, useful data flow to teachers. Under this
approach, schools have good baseline data available to them, which
means that the data are useful for diagnostic purposes in the classroom
and thus relevant to instruction. The data also are timely, meaning
that teachers rarely have to wait more than a few days to get results.
In an effective data-driven school, educators also are very clear about
what essential instructional outcomes they are trying to achieve (this
is actually much rarer than one would suppose) and set both short- and
long-term measurable instructional goals from their data.
Armed
with clarity of purpose and clarity of goals, effective data-driven
educators then monitor student progress during the year on those
essential outcomes by checking in periodically with short, strategic
formative assessments. They get together with role-alike peers on a
regular basis to go over the data from those formative assessments, and
they work as a team, not as isolated individuals, to formulate
instructional interventions for the students who are still struggling
to achieve mastery on those essential outcomes. After a short period of
time, typically three to six weeks, they check in again with new
assessments to see if their interventions have worked and to see which
students still need help. The more this part of the model occurs during
the year, the more chances teachers have to make changes for the
benefit of students.
It is this middle part of the model that
often is missing in school organizations. When it is in place and
functioning well, schools are much more likely to achieve their short-
and long-term instructional goals and students are much more likely to
achieve proficiency on accountability-oriented standardized tests.
Teachers in schools that have this part of the model mastered rarely,
if ever, complain about assessment because the data they are getting
are helpful to their classroom practice.
NCLB did us no favors.
It could’ve stressed powerful formative assessment, which is the
driving engine for student learning and growth on whatever outcomes one
chooses. Instead, it went another direction and we lost an opportunity
to truly understand the power of data-driven practice. There are
hundreds, and probably thousands, of schools across the country that
have figured out the middle part of the model despite NCLB. It is these
schools that are profiled in books such as Whatever It Takes and It’s Being Done (both recommended reads) and by organizations such as The Education Trust.
When
done right, data-driven decision-making is about helping educators make
informed decisions to benefit students. It is about helping schools
know whether what they are doing is working or not. I have seen
effective data-driven practice take root and it is empowering for both
teachers and students. We shouldn’t unilaterally reject the idea
of data-driven education just because we hate NCLB. If we do, we lose
out on the potential of informed practice.Thanks for the guest spot, eduwonkette!
Powered by FireStats